This article is within the scope of WikiProject King Arthur, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of King Arthur, the Arthurian era and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.King ArthurWikipedia:WikiProject King ArthurTemplate:WikiProject King ArthurKing Arthur articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles
See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:
Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Changing Anglo-Saxon to 'Old English' is unnecessary: it is the same language under different names and some linguists refer one rather than the other.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 11:18, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I have uploaded images of Slaughterbridge to Wiki Commons and embedded them in the article. Therefore I have also removed the photoreq template. Andy F (talk) 16:15, 21 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments5 people in discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Not split. Very stale, with only two opposes since 2018. Salix alba (talk): 13:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
This article appears to comprise information on three separate settlements under the name of one. If this is the usual method for handling adjoining settlements, then I withdraw this proposal. However, I cannot recall seeing this practice elsewhere and if the settlements are not split to independent articles, I would expect a page title that indicates that it is about multiple settlements and text that explains why they are grouped together. —Ost (talk) 18:53, 11 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
Support: Split into three seperate articles; quite strange why they are together. SmartyPants22 (talk) 16:12, 21 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
Oppose; nothing would be gained by making three articles except the enforcement of a rule. Their location can be understood very well as it is.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 14:32, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Comment:I don't think any of the settlements are significant enough to justify three separate articles, but I don't think grouping them together on a whim (and with an inadequate title) is particularly satisfactory either. WP:UKCITIES advises covering small settlements under the relevant civil parish in these cases, so I would be inclined to merge the Slaughterbridge content to Camelford and that for the other hamlets to Forrabury and Minster. Jellyman (talk) 18:18, 20 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
"Charlotte Boscawen, Dowager Lady Falmouth (the daughter of Hugh Boscawen" I'm pretty sure she was Hugh Boscawen's widow, not his daughter, otherwise she wouldn't have been Dowager Lady Falmouth. Bodrugan (talk) 11:41, 17 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
