Talk:Sir Charles Sedley, 5th Baronet
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled edit
The portrait for this article is inaccurate. The man pictured is Sir Charles Sedley, 6th baronet, of Nuthall Temple in Nottinghamshire. See provenance of portrait here. Shockingbadhats (talk) 06:51, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- 2nd not 6th Baronet - see Sir Charles Sedley, 2nd Baronet. Picture now moved. Tryde (talk) 16:44, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
List edit
I have added the list of Sedley's works and material for further reading. Dalmatiner Henry (talk) 20:09, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Pinto's edition is no longer the standard edition for the plays. Dalmatiner Henry (talk) 12:00, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
See the edition of 2001 in the list! Dalmatiner Henry (talk) 20:15, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
I have added some aspects on Sedley's poetry and translations and on his parliamentary career. Dalmatiner Henry (talk) 21:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! — LlywelynII 02:57, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Sources for future article expansion edit
Kindly restore these to the article as they are used as sources to verify statements in the text:
- Vivian de Sola Pinto, Sir Charles Sedley 1639-1701: A Study in the Life and Literature of the Restoration (London, 1927).
- Michael Benjamin Hudnall Jr. Moral Design in the Plays of Sir Charles Sedley (University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 1984).
- Robert D. Hume, The Development of English Drama in the Late Seventeenth Century (Oxford, 1976).
- Derek Hughes, English Drama 1660-1700 (Oxford, 1996).
Alternatively, they can be included in a #Further reading section if some curation is attempted, with explanations given as to their importance, bias, etc. (A better route would be to include a #Legacy section that includes treatment of these and then includes their bibliographic information with the other sources of the article.) — LlywelynII 02:56, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Cleanup needed edit
The acts responsible for his reputation and political career aren't separate sections from his #Life, though they might be subsections of it. His posthumous legacy should be separated out, though. — LlywelynII 03:04, 1 October 2016 (UTC)