 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 27 October 2019. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sinemia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Copyvio issues edit
@Diannaa: Can you delete the recent versions? They copy directly from sources such as businessinsider. D4iNa4 (talk) 15:59, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Distuption edit
There seems to be some disruptive editing going on regarding recent events on this company. Please discuss these point on this Talk Page. Otherwise, we will seek to protect the page and prevent IP/new editing from making changes. thanks. Britishfinance (talk) 12:33, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Single sided editing should be out of question, I think publishing articles based on personal opinion should not happen.Calling something "bad" depends on the person and the definiton "bad" is subjective.
About publishing an article edit
Isnt it necessary to leave out personal or public assumptions when editing a Wikipedia page if a credible source is not present?
- Here is also another article from USA Today on Sinemia closing down Bye, bye Sinemia: MoviePass competitor calls it quits, abruptly shuts down US operation Britishfinance (talk) 15:23, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
User: Arikkokmerih edit
You need to explain properly why you are deleting sections of this article. In one of your deletions, you said that Sinemia was not shutting down and that it was just from a Business Insider article, however, I have found similar articles on USA Today Bye, bye Sinemia: MoviePass competitor calls it quits, abruptly shuts down US operation, and others? Your actions, therefore, make you look like a disruptive editor which is why your edits are being reverted. If you continue, you will get blocked and the article will get protected so that only experienced editors can edit on it. However, if this article is misleading, we can address that too. You need to specifically state the issues with this article so that we can check them. Britishfinance (talk) 15:33, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Just list them out here and start each issue with a separate bullet (type in "*" at start), and when finished sign your posts by typing in "Britishfinance (talk) 15:35, 14 May 2019 (UTC)". Britishfinance (talk) 15:35, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Unauthentic Content edit
@Diannaa: and @Britishfinance: This info is wrong and it should be removed as per Wikipedia policy. It is degrading a person entity. WP: LIBEL and WP:POV "An April 25, 2019 Change.org petition calls for lawmakers to "Arrest Sinemia CEO Rifat Oguz for Theft & Fraud Against the American Moviegoer." (Soodanlalita (talk) 15:01, 23 May 2019 (UTC))
- I have removed this sentence in the lede of the article as I could not find any sourcing for it. Britishfinance (talk) 16:28, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 May 2019 edit
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In USA, able to browse https://www.sinemia.com/new-plans and enroll for plans. I believe this action would be a waste of money for users since there won't be any response from Sinemia 72.84.249.230 (talk) 14:20, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- What are you requesting that is specifically changed (if anything) to the article? thanks. Britishfinance (talk) 14:36, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Sam Sailor 15:12, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 May 2019 edit
| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Soodanlalita (talk) 16:09, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- See above, have removed this sentance as it had no sourcing. Britishfinance (talk) 16:29, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Copyedit edit
Changed the sentence "...thus leaving many compelled to provide their personal identification documents as unusual and invasive as the demand is." to "thus leaving many compelled to provide their personal identification documents despite how unusual and invasive the demand was."
Looking to fix the tense issues with this sentence. However, this line almost feels opinionated; "unusual and invasive". I didn't see anyone specifically calling out as invasive in the refs, but I may have missed it. King keudo (talk) 22:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)