This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've always heard the first vowel sound pronounced as [ə] (i.e., a schwa, the io sound in nation) rather than [ɪ] (i.e., the i in bid), as the article currently states. Should the pronunciation be [ʃɪˈneɪd] or [ʃəˈneɪd]? --Muchness 20:00, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The name's meaning offered in this article is inconsistent with the Wikipedia entry for Siobhan, it's purported source of derivation. Someone knowledgeable in this area should look into this and make the name meanings consistent, or remove the claim of their common derivation. --Yankel
75.18.209.52 (talk) 00:20, 17 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
I've just cleaned up that article. An editor recently added unsourced information that gave a completely different etymology. Thanks for bring this up.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 06:00, 17 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article looks... well... messy. I'm not even sure how to go about editing it. It looks like two people had a disagreement? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.222.103.179 (talk) 18:59, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
