Talk:Simon Fraser, 16th Lord Lovat
Latest comment: 2 years ago by CiphriusKane in topic PROD
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Liz (talk · contribs) on 9 August 2021. It was contested by CiphriusKane (talk · contribs) on 2021-08-11 with the comment: BLPprod now sourced |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16th, 18th, or both? edit
Can someone please explain the issue regarding "Simon the 18th and 16th Lord", thanks. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:35, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
- He's the 18th clan chief unofficially and the 16th clan chief officially due to two earlier clan chiefs forfeiting the title
PROD edit
I've added six sources to the article so the BLPProd is now invalid. Only one of them (the Scotsman reference) would count as SIGCOV by my analysis though. Part of the issue with finding sources is that there were two clan chiefs who forfeited the title, hence the 16th 18th Lord thing, and searching for references for "16th Lord Lovat" brings up references for Simon Fraser, 14th Lord Lovat, (who would be 16th if the two forfeited clan chiefs are counted) CiphriusKane (talk) 15:19, 11 August 2021 (UTC)