Talk:Significance analysis of microarrays
This article was nominated for deletion on 27 April 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article may be too technical for most readers to understand.(May 2009) |
The contents of the Significance analysis of microarrays page were merged into Microarray analysis techniques on 15 January 2019 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Proposed move edit
Would anyone object to a move from SAM: Significance Analysis of Microarrays to simply Significance Analysis of Microarrays? - Eldereft ~(s)talk~ 16:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Potential False Discovery Rate Formula Error edit
The False Discovery rate is listed as: Median (90th Percentile) of # of falsely called genes/ Number of genes called significant. Just thought I should note that by definition the Median is the 50th Percentile (not the 90th). Thanks128.255.38.95 (talk) 18:48, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
SAM calculations unclear edit
The images Samcalc.jpg and RandS.jpg are very low quality and quite hard to read, additionally whoever added it has not explained it properly. s is described as being computed as a percentile based on alpha but nowhere in the article is there any mention of this alpha. This section should be rewritten. I am currently researching this method and if no one has any objections will find the time to improve it. 128.40.94.87 (talk) 13:27, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Authorship edit
Who the hell wrote this article? It reads like an advertisement. Hwfr (talk) 01:53, 31 March 2016 (UTC)