This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article depends a lot on the Historic Preservation Report for the Ladies Mile in NYC, volume 1 from 1989. The link is dead. I searched for it, and can find only volume 2, which starts with page numbers beyond 400. I formatted the citation in the text, and used rp format for the page numbers, as it is simple to do with few references in the article but many references to that report. But the dead link, it seems unlikely that the bot will find that in the archives, well, what do I know about what the bot will find? Anyway, this place is interesting to me in Chicago, as I just learned my grandmother met my grandfather, because she worked at the store and his sisters shopped there. That happened around 1908, so I did not accept the line that Siegel-Cooper left Chicago 7 years after it opened in this building in 1891. I relied on the Encyclopedia of Chicago source, which said it was there until 1930, after re-organizing its itself financially in 1914-15. None of the sources address what name was outside on the building, versus name changes of a corporation not visible to customers really directly, but the Encyclopedia of Chicago was closest to that, and the source already used in the article. --Prairieplant (talk) 17:37, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
