Talk:Shockley–Ramo theorem

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Shockley–Ramo theorem article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 22 January 2011 by reviewer Chzz (talk · contribs).

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Error in formula edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Main formula of the article is wrong, dimensional analysis indicates [V/m][C][m/s]=[J/s]=[W] which is not [A] for current — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phadd (talk • contribs) 23:59, 26 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Think of the "electric field" used here as deriving from the weighting field, which is unitless, yet varies in space. The gradient is non-zero due to it's variance in space, but it's unitless nature now dictates that the "electric field" here as units of inverse meters. I plan on adding integral form, but literature is still not to common outside of research papers (of which there are many) Footlessmouse (talk) 11:40, 23 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic