Talk:Shawna Robinson/GA1

Latest comment: 7 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply


I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  15:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    "and made her début in the Winston Cup Series (now the Sprint Cup Series)" - no accented 'e' in American English
    removed MWright96 (talk) 21:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
    "Robinson was born on November 30, 1964 in Des Moines, Iowa" - needs a couple of links
      Done MWright96 (talk) 21:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
    "She and her siblings, were taught that they were allowed to do anything" - unnecessary comma
    removed MWright96 (talk) 21:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    No original research found.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Once again another excellent article. If you plan on taking this to FAC then I would recommend adding some images if possible. I read through the whole thing and checked most of the references I could access, but couldn't find any issues so I'll pass this outright. Well done!   JAGUAR  18:53, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply