Talk:Shangjing Longquanfu

China: History Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history (assessed as Mid-importance).

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

Requested move edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Shangjing Longquanfu → Sanggyeong – I feel this page should be renamed Sanggyeong as nearly all links to it are Sanggyeong. It also seems inappropriate to use the Mandarin name and pronunciation as the title that is otherwise displayed as historically Korean. Parhe (talk) 04:01, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Putting this through, as it previously went the other way without discussion. Dekimasuよ! 20:47, 29 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

"Shangjing Longquanfu" is preferable per WP:COMMONNAME. Google search for "Shangjing Longquanfu" -wikipedia produces 1,080 results, while "Sanggyeong Yongcheonbu" -wikipedia returns only 245. "Shangjing" or "Sanggyeong" by itself should be avoided due to ambiguity. Literally "upper capital", the term can refer to a number of ancient places. -Zanhe (talk) 01:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Simple google searches do not establish a common name. In reliable sources, both Sanggyeong Yongcheonbu and Shangjing Longquanfu are rarely used in reliable sources. While it's claimed that Sanggyeong and Shangjing are ambiguous, this is only the case for Chinese, not Korean. Sanggyeong is a distinctive word that refers to the Balhae capital, and thus considering common use of Sanggyeong and its distinctiveness in the context of Korean history, Sanggyeong is the better word to use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.191.250.254 (talk) 06:55, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic