Talk:Shakespeare attribution studies
Latest comment: 8 years ago by 37.209.42.230 in topic Empty sections ?
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
References and cites edit
Smatprt, I appreciate the help (believe it or don't), and I know you probably need a break from the SAQ shitstorm as much as I do, but would you please format your references to the Harvnb style? You can find the templates here. I'm editing for the long run with eventual FA status in mind, since this is a topic I'm extremely interested in, and I want to avoid a big reformatting job in the future. It saves time in the long run. Tom Reedy (talk) 19:45, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- Sure - I'll give it a go. BTW - What do you think about merging Shakespeare's collaborations into this article? Looking at it just now, it is hardly worth summarizing it's so small... Just a thought. Smatprt (talk) 20:39, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- I'd say leave it alone for now, but maybe use it as a base for section 6 later. Right now there needs to be a unique article for people who are searching for information about Shakespeare's collaborations rather than having to wade through 10 or 15 articles. My main purpose in creating this article was to explain the methods that have been used specifically in Shakespeare attribution as opposed to the generic topic of attribution itself. Vickers gives a pretty good history. Tom Reedy (talk) 20:55, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Empty sections ? edit
I've never seen that elsewhere... I don't see the purpose either. Itd be nice to have them filled, but as that doesnt seem to be happening, I reckon they should be removed ? 37.209.42.230 (talk) 19:25, 30 July 2015 (UTC)