| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Shadows of P'Jem article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on February 1, 2008. The result of the discussion was procedural keep, given ArbCom injunction on deleting such material. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Shadows of P'Jem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060323133050/http://www.computercrowsnest.com/features/arc/2002/nz5758.php to http://www.computercrowsnest.com/features/arc/2002/nz5758.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:50, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Sight gag edit
This episode included a sight gag where Archer and T'Pol are tied up, try to get up, and she falls on top of him. I thought this was a strange detail to highlight in the episode article, until I few a found sources that mentioned it. Then I found more sources, and it was even the topic of conversation on The Daily Show when Scott Bakula talked to John Stewart.[1][2] The article probably has enough sources on it already, so I mentioned it here instead because I thought it was WP:UNDUE emphasis at first but it seems as if people really did make a big deal of this at the time and it did get a lot of attention. -- 109.79.85.218 (talk) 04:33, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Ratings edit
Variety reported ratings “Enterprise” (6.05m, 3.1/8 in 18-49)[3] -- 109.76.200.100 (talk) 03:35, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- If I've got the dates right the above figure was the overnight ratings. On February 12 Variety looked at the weeks ratings and said Enterprise rated 3.9/11 in men 18-49 [4] which would seem to be the final rating.
- Confusingly TV Tango puts the ratings at 3.8/6,[5] -- 109.76.200.100 (talk) 03:48, 23 June 2021 (UTC)