Talk:Sexual Sterilization Act

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

Human rights

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

What do you mean? The word "scandal" does not appear in the whole article. --Randykitty (talk) 16:23, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Opps I meant for that comment to appear on the Talk page for the Wikipedia Article -List of Canadian Political Scandals — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronwi (talk • contribs) 14:27, 4 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Is this language anachronistic? edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm specifically looking at the part of the opening paragraph that reads "[t]he Act, drafted to protect the gene pool". I'm not all that familiar with the field, but my understanding is that gene theory was not really a thing when this bill was drafted. What would be a better way of putting this?

p.s. Sorry if this isn't quite the right use of the talk page. Just noticed an issue I'm not equipped to address while in the middle of studying and couldn't think of a better way to flag it.

DIWesser (talk) 17:58, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic