Talk:Service Data Objects

Latest comment: 7 years ago by 138.62.237.155 in topic Invalid Link

Name collision edit

There is a near-perfect name collision with CANopen's Service Data Object protocol. Perhaps there should be a (standard) "not to be confused with" message? --Mortense (talk) 19:09, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

  DoneLeadSongDog come howl! 20:29, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Invalid Link edit

The link to SDO specification "SDO Specifications at OpenSOA" is no longer valid , suggest using http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/testcontent/sdo-specification-java-v2-131073.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.65.159.98 (talk) 11:25, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Confirmation edit

Confirming that the link

as well as

seemed to be broken as of 2017-04-19.

138.62.237.155 (talk) 05:50, 19 April 2017 (UTC)Reply