Talk:Sedgebrook

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

I'd love to hear people's thoughts on the census data, is it too much information? Should it be heavily summarised (like the 1841 data is currently) or left as per the original data (like the 1861 data is now) DancingGerbil (talk) 20:47, 8 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

This seems to conflict with the info we've got on the hall / manor, could it be a different building? Rebuilt? DancingGerbil (talk) 21:08, 25 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'd say believe English Heritage any day. Two bouts of alteration, if not rebuilding are mentioned. I suppose you could take a walk down Church Lane just to make sure it hasn't got another manor house hidden away somewhere! Bmcln1 (talk) 21:18, 25 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Sedgebrook. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:48, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply