Talk:Second Northern War/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:08, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: I could not determine the correct target for Frederick of Hesse, all the Wikipedia articles are about later Fredericks. I fixed all others. diff

Link rot: No dead links.

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   This article is well written and complies with the WP:MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   The article is well referenced, I assume good faith for the sources, which all appear reliable.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Thorough and focussed, giving an overviewe without too much intricate detail.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I am very happy to pass this as a good article. Congratulations! I shall leave you decide what to do about Frederick of Hess. Perhaps there is not an artcile on this particular noble. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:10, 12 April 2010 (UTC)