Talk:Sean Maluta

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Jacknstock in topic Contract with WWE

Contract with WWE edit

The article currently says that Maluta is "not officially signed" by WWE. It has occurred to me that he would have a contract to appear, so he is signed by WWE. The word "officially" is redundant when referring to contracts - there is no such thing as an "unofficial" contract that is legally binding (i.e., not fraudulent). I think the correct phrase would be that he is "not kayfabe signed" if that is a part of the storyline. If his contractual status is not a part of the storyline, the phrase should be removed entirely. I'm removing the reference to his contractual status as it is unsourced, but I am open to discussion. Jack N. Stock (talk) 19:29, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply