Talk:Sean Egan

Trouble with the word 'most active'

Where is the source for calling gaim 'one of the most active' projects on sourceforge. Since Sean was hired by google, work on Gaim has crept to almost a complete standstil. Proof: gaim2.0 is in beta from oct. 17th. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.58.253.131 (talk • contribs) 18:58, November 22, 2006

In the lower right corner of the sourceforge front page, there is a list of "most active" projects. I'm not sure how sf calculates this metric. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xlynx (talk • contribs) 16:30, January 14, 2007

I'm in agreement with the original protestor; this is not one of the most active projects, regardless of how sourceforge uses the term (I think it's simply number of downloads). At any rate, Gaim was in beta for over 2 years, and features have been stagnant for just as long.

wikiworthy?

Is Sean high enough profile to merit a wikipedia article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xlynx (talk • contribs) 16:30, January 14, 2007

Definitely GAIM is a major piece of open source software and Sean is a field expert (which is noted as a reason for wiki-worthiness. Reboot 19:32, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Isn't he the cofounder of Egan-Jones rating corporation that just had a problem with the SEC? Isn't that worthy of a link to Sean Egan??Mylittlezach (talk) 01:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

myspace

can anyone verify that the myspace that is linked to on this page is actually his? it certainly looks like a fake page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.33.141.208 (talk • contribs) 02:01, January 28, 2007

grumble, I don't really know much about this Sean Egan character but if it was actually his it must be some kind of a joke. --Bruce 20:09, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Notability

It seems like he may qualify under WP:AUTH:3, since Pidgin is a well-known piece of software. However, his role in the creation of Pidgin does not appear to have been important enough to warrant a mention on Pidgin's own Wikipedia page (at least as of 08/09/11). Furthermore, only a single cited article is primarily dedicated to discussing Egan, and it is in a specialty magazine (eWeek). The other media citations all mention him in passing or use him as a source. Forbes is the only major non-specialist publication on the list, and it quotes him only in passing. There is no record of him receiving any significant industry awards. If his role in the creation of Pidgin was indeed notable, this should be made clear in the text (with supporting sources), and should likely serve as the main focus of the article. DarwinPeacock (talk) 02:33, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Seanegan.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Seanegan.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:11, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sean Egan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081010145057/http://skypejournal.com/blog/2006/01/sean_egan_etel.html to http://skypejournal.com/blog/2006/01/sean_egan_etel.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:34, 21 March 2016 (UTC)