Talk:Sean (Street Fighter)

Confirmed by All About Capcom

I don't care if it's confirmed in that book. There is absolutely no way Ryu and Ken would not be in SFIII. SF1=Ryu and Ken versus fighters from around the world. SF2=Ryu and Ken versus fighters from around the world, SF3=A comedy Ryu styyle character against fighters from around the world? Must be mis-translated or a mistake from who ever said it. Before its release, there was only one thing certain about SFIII, that it would include Ryu and Ken alongside an all new supporting roster. Mr. Bonus 19:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

• Hehe...hahaha...wow, now there's a good one. Unfortunately that book happens to be offical text from Capcom and it's a little hard to mistranslate that. Keep it to facts, not your point of view. None of the returning street fighter characters were supposed to appear in SF3: it was meant to be an entirely new game.--Kung Fu Man 20:07, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
  • I'm still not buying it. There's no way that is true. Just because it is in that book, doesn't mean that it is definitely true. The lead planner of SFIII didn't look through the book with a fine tooth comb looking for any mis-quotes that may be in it. Mr.bonus 22:39, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Bonus, that's like arguing with an autobiography. That is what the book states, and that is the last word on how a game was designed. As it stands we have to go with the most accurate information we can get, and this is it.--Kung Fu Man 23:04, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
    • It's also not unheard of for games to throw out a major selling point just to "try something new". JuJube 01:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Voice of Sean

• Does anyone have a copy of Third Strike? If so, the voice credits should clear up who voices Sean in 3s. JuJube 06:16, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
  • I just checked last night; turns out I was wrong. :( Oh well. JuJube 00:20, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Sean3rd.gif

Image:Sean3rd.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 10:41, 21 January 2008 (UTC)