A fact from Scrooge, or, Marley's Ghost appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 December 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Is this right: Scrooge, or, Marley's Ghost
or is this right: Scrooge, or Marley's Ghost
--Soenke Rahn (talk) 02:01, 19 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Why do you think the form we're using is incorrect? It's fairly standard for a Victorian book to have a title of the form Title, or, Subtitle.--Prosfilaes (talk) 02:46, 19 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
BFI says that the duration of the surviving footage is 3:26, not 5:30. Can someone correct this info? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.13.31.84 (talk) 17:53, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
While on Commons, there's a copy of this video which is 5 minutes long. I know about WP:OR, but what happens with this? Seagull123 Φ 22:15, 14 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
