While I am not the user who worked on this article since it's deletion at AfD, I can clearly see that it is substantially different from the state it was in before (good job on that, by the way). This version actually has sources, which was the main point for deletion before. Things like this are extremely good coverage and they weren't in the article previously. If you want to delete this again, I think you should take it to AfD, because the subject seems to have a bit more notability than it did before. SilverserenC 21:45, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
