This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I don't feel it's necessary for additions of those two images from the film. Wikipedia isn't the place for random, meaningless images that only a small group of obsessed fans would like (and I'm not kidding about the obsessed part because theses images seem to benefit them and only them), whereas when an image is used for a film, it's usually for something important like in Dirty Dancing. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk) 13:38, 17 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Please link images in talk if you're going to discuss them, makes it easier. This seems like a lot of just your opinion. Screenshots are never chosen randomly, nor is any picture meaningless. Images could be of interest to anyone who hears of the series, not just fans. Fans would already have seen it and have access to images. An obsessed fan in particular would gain nothing from viewing the image since they would already be familiar with the material. Dirty Dancing may be more popular but that doesn't make it a more important work. The Scooby-Doo universe is larger than the DD universe, and a lot of people find monster flicks (and crossover flicks) a lot more imagination-requiring than some teens getting their grind on in a lake and upsetting their parents. 184.145.18.50 (talk) 00:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
You know exactly what images I'm talking about, so don't act ignorant (what images could I possibly be referring to?) Yes, this page is just as important as Dirty Dancing, but the scene in Dirty Dancing where they finally achieve the balancing pose is way more monumental than anything in this film. The images, while illustrating some loose point of what is going on, is merely a fan boy attribution which has been accepted, fortunately for you fan boys. There is nothing genuinely monumental about the now two images that were added, other than the fanboys getting their excitement on about the film. That is not what Wikipedia's about, that's not opinion. An opinion is what you fanboys are adding to this page. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk) 12:30, 16 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Recently someone on /co/ named "Toonspew" claimed they interviewed Leopold, the creator of this, in relation to a fan webcomic they're doing about it. http://8ch.net/co/res/533840.html It includes a lot of interesting information like the basis of character names, such as Elsa Frankensteen being named after Elsa Lanchester and Tanis being named after Tana leaves. I don't think we can cite a chan thread as a source though so I'm going to look and see if I can find this in some other format. 184.145.18.50 (talk) 00:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
