Talk:Scaled Composites Model 367 BiPod
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Steelpillow in topic BIPOD
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Article needs a photo edit
The article really needs a photo or a drawing of the BiPod "convertible" aeroplane/automobile. I would imagine that a small thumbnail photo could be used in the article under the "Fair Use" clause in US copyright law. Cheers. N2e (talk) 13:47, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- Here are many images which might be used, some of which would fall under the Fair Use criteria. Google search
BIPOD edit
This article title currently uses the capitalisation "BiPod." the company website project page capitalises it as "BIPOD." Any objections to moving this article to the associated title? — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 03:32, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- None here. If that's what the mfgr. calls it, best we get it corrected. N2e (talk) 04:01, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure the MoS requires that "BIPOD" be rendered as "Bipod" (never mind that's inventing a name used only for Wikipedia, all glory to the
HypnotoadMoS). - The Bushranger One ping only 15:56, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure the MoS requires that "BIPOD" be rendered as "Bipod" (never mind that's inventing a name used only for Wikipedia, all glory to the
- Well, it doesn't seem to be an acronym, so MOS:CAPS says that in that case we should write "Bipod". That's still a move, though not the one I originally assumed. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 16:45, 7 October 2013 (UTC)