Talk:Say My Name (Tove Styrke song)

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Cartoon network freak in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Say My Name (Tove Styrke song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cartoon network freak (talk · contribs) 07:27, 14 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Lead edit

  • You might want to replace "first single" with lead single
  • from her previous studio album → from the material of her previous studio album
  • eleventh best → eleventh-best

Infobox edit

  • ALT text for the cover artwork
  • We don't need "RCA", as it wasn't the main label conducting the release

Background edit

  • the first song conceptualized → the first conceptualized song
  • differs from her second studio album → same as in the lead

Composition and lyrics edit

  • that she has previously avoided writing → that she had previously avoided writing
  • Sample > A [LENTH]-second sample

Release edit

  • This section should follow the "Background" one
  • first single → as in the lead
  • Link "download" and "streaming"

Reception edit

  • took home the prize → unencyclopedic; use "received the prize"
  • and remained for a week → and remained on the ranking for a week

Music video edit

  • with Tim Mardell as producer, William Tornwall as production manager and Stefan Ström as editor → with Tim Mardell as the producer, William Tornwall as the production manager and Stefan Ström as the editor
  • and Nicke Lund was in charge of set design → and Nicke Lund was in charge of the set design

Formats and track listings edit

  • Flawless :)

Credits and personnel edit

  • Flawless :)

Charts edit

  • Flawless :)

Release history edit

  • Unlink everything, as already mentioned before in the article's body
  • Just "Various" suffices

Other things edit

  • 27.5% is a very good percentage for copyviolation
  • No disambiguation links
  • No dead links
  • As far as I checked them, the references do support the assertions made in this article

Outcome edit

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.