Talk:Sarah Dines

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Edwint512 in topic Impartial sources needed.

Article detail edit

The level of detail in this article is far too high: for example, listing all of this MP's APPG memberships, the debates she has spoken in, and including references to her support for every type of business in her constituency. It really needs trimming. --TrottieTrue (talk) 02:57, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Impartial sources needed. edit

23 of the sources on the page are from Sarah Dines' own website and social media. I would make the claim that these are unreliable sources and go against NPoV. There has been a number of quite substantial edits by people with no prior editing history, I'm not one to go against the free and open nature of Wikipedia, I'm somewhat of an amateur myself, if people are frothing at the mouth to write about Sarah Dines MP that would be no business of mine, just seems some of her most ardent supporters have written this.

No problem with any of the content that's on the page, as long as reliable and impartial sources are available to back it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edwint512 (talkcontribs) 10:27, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply