Talk:Sanjay Raut
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Edit warring by IP User:112.79.61.118 edit
New user 112.79.61.118 is edit warring to restore disputed WP:BLP violations, as shown here. He has been warned at his user talk page. NedFausa (talk) 18:24, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Controversies section seems like vendetta campaign edit
Seems to be very random, who asked to apologize? Is it someone with authority like Court or Some Government minister, or maybe huge number of people. Do you think there should be some clarification. Also second claim of regarding kangana ranaut, I went through article referenced. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/mumbai/sanjay-raut-seeks-apology-from-kangana-ranaut-over-comments-on-mumbai/article32534749.ece .. It suggests that Raut is asking kangana to apologize, but here they are pointing out otherwise. Can someone rewrite this with some good validate references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.91.75.62 (talk) 18:08, 13 November 2020 (UTC)