Talk:Sandy Hudson

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Catfish Jim in topic Claim of BLP vio

Claim of BLP vio edit

An IP is claiming a BLP violation wrt this material [1]., claiming " verifiability, primary sources, circular reporting, victimization, gossip, and people who are relatively unknown" I'm not seeing it. Is anyone else? There are solid reliable sources (National Post, CTV, Global, etc). Just because it may reflect poorly on the subject does not make it a BLP vio. Meters (talk) 07:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

See also Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Sandy_Hudson. My knee-jerk reaction is that the Sandy_Hudson#Scandal_and_lawsuit section is very detailed and should perhaps be shortened per WP:PROPORTION, but I haven't checked the sources. There's also issues with punctuation after references and using first name instead of "Hudson". Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:04, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Some of the information was not corroborated by the sources, was inaccurate, or was completely false. I've adjusted that to match the sources, along with changing it to use her last name per WP:LASTNAME. Gbear605 (talk) 15:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
I've trimmed it a bit more to remove any non-neutral language. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 16:48, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply