This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Florida, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.University of FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject University of FloridaTemplate:WikiProject University of FloridaUniversity of Florida articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida State University, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Florida State University on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Florida State UniversityWikipedia:WikiProject Florida State UniversityTemplate:WikiProject Florida State UniversityFlorida State University articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I have restored the sort key of "Dalemberte, Sandy", rather than its equivalent "Dalemberte, Talbot" (with or without "Sandy" after it). This is because the name "Talbot" does not appear in the title, and will therefore not appear in category listings. The sort key is not a substitute for article naming, and no text should appear in the sort key which does not appear in the title. It would only confuse people to have a list of people named (for example) "Sally", "Sandy", "Steven", "Taffy" and "Trevor" sorted as "Sally", "Steven", "Taffy", "Sandy" and "Trevor", just because the person covered by the article "Sandy Xxx" is really called "Talbot Xxx". The sorting must be based solely on the visible text; articles are only sorted by forename if the forename is included in the title. I had overlooked the additional "Talbot" and quote marks in my previous edits, for which I apologise, and I hope this comment will clarify the issue. --Stemonitis 18:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
