Talk:Same-sex marriage in Iowa

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

The link for Reference #2 is broken. ^ Greg Schulte (10 December 2008). "Gay marriage: History, emotion collide in court". Retrieved on 2008-12-10. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.2.244.48 (talk) 14:22, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


Proposal to Remove External Link "Legal Analysis of the Decision" Link. This is NOT a true legal analysis that one would find in a law review journal, rather it is siimply a blog entry by a lawyer. His views are presented in a heavily biased, non-scholarly fashion. This should be either deleted. It has no scholarly value. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.181.121.29 (talk) 06:29, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Some reference should be made to the retention of the district court judge- more people voted to retain him in his district than voted to retain the Supreme Court justices. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.125.232.177 (talk) 19:14, 4 November 2010 (UTC)Reply


Drake Study edit

I'm not sure why my edit was undone without explanation. The poll information that I removed was not a scientific poll. If you read the methodology of the study, you'll notice that they say "The survey link was distributed using various social media outlets including Facebook and Twitter, web pages, and e-mail. In an effort to balance conservative, liberal and independent responses, researchers requested distribution of the survey link to several special interest groups on both sides of the issue."[1] Also, calling it a "Drake University study" is quite misleading given that it was done by students as part of a class project. The study was not conducted by any Drake faculty, and it was not peer reviewed. I don't see how this has any place in Wikipedia. --Alienmercy (talk) 19:22, 3 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

It's not up to us to judge the validity of any poll or survey, only to report what secondary sources say. I would support its reinsertion if it's notable in itself (e.g., discussed by multiple reliable sources over the course of more than a few days). If that happens, the wording might make clear that the methodology is suspect, but that also would need to be reliably sourced. Let's give it some time and see how it shakes out. Rivertorch (talk) 19:51, 3 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Edit request on 24 April 2013 edit

Iowa was the third American state to grant marriage to same-sex couples.[2] Jcs10der (talk) 23:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Done Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 00:30, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply


  1. ^ Fanning; et al. "Iowa LGBT Marriage Study 2011" (PDF). Iowa LGBT Marriage Study 2011. Retrieved 3 July 2011. {{cite web}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |last= (help)
  2. ^ Lorentzen, Amy (April 3, 2009). "Iowa becomes third state to legalize gay marriage". Associated Press. Retrieved April 3, 2009.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Same-sex marriage in Iowa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:35, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply