Talk:Saint-Nicolas-du-Chardonnet

Organ

There is some history on the instrument in the church. That would make a good addition to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.183.193.44 (talk) 18:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Uncited Material

If no-one objects I'm going to delete the following uncited material in a few days. Of course, if citations do appear I will not delete this:

• the Society of St. Pius X attempted to occupy another church in Paris, St-Germain l'Auxerrois.
• In [[1978]], the ''[[Court of Cassation (France)|Cour de Cassation]]'' confirmed that the occupation was illegal, (the fact that they were told to leave is cited by the next footnote, it's the Cour de Cassation that will be removed)
• On [[February 20]], [[1987]], the ''[[Conseil d'État]]'' ruled that the disturbance to [[public order]] resulting from an expulsion would be higher than that resulting from the illegal occupation.
• , several executives of the Society of St Pius X were accused of disseminating anti-Semitic [[propaganda]] at St Nicolas, but were found unguilty.
• against the wishes of the [[French Socialist Party|Socialist]] Mayor, [[Bertrand Delanoë]], who considered it an internal matter for the Catholic Church,
• remarking that the [[Archbishop of Paris]] had not requested that the Society be expelled.

JASpencer 15:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

1977 occupation and consequences

This section needs further elaboration by those familiar with the subject. Who was the parish priest and why was he "expelled"? In other words, what was the conflict about that caused members of the Society of St. Pius X to take this unusual action? Is the "occupation" of the church still in effect to the present day, and what do the "occupiers" hope to achieve?  JGHowes  ^talk 01:20, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Saint-Nicolas-du-Chardonnet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311042006/http://www.v1.paris.fr/BMO/delib/CMDELIB20020624/CMDELIB200206242002_V._83.htm to http://www.v1.paris.fr/BMO/delib/CMDELIB20020624/CMDELIB200206242002_V._83.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.v1.paris.fr/BMO/debat/cmdebat20020624/CMDEBAT20020624-183.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060811210614/http://www.sspx.org/headquarters.html to http://www.sspx.org/headquarters.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:00, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 22 January 2020

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed, without opposition. BD2412 T 01:39, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

• Saint-Nicolas du Chardonnet → Saint-Nicolas-du-Chardonnet
• Saint-Jacques du Haut-Pas → Saint-Jacques-du-Haut-Pas
• Saint-Antoine des Quinze-Vingts → Saint-Antoine-des-Quinze-Vingts
• Saint-Pierre de Chaillot → Saint-Pierre-de-Chaillot
• Saint-Louis en l'Île → Saint-Louis-en-l'Île
• Notre-Dame des Blancs-Manteaux → Notre-Dame-des-Blancs-Manteaux

– The articles on the French Wikipedia aren't consistent themselves about the use of hyphens, e.g. Notre-Dame-d'Auteuil and Notre-Dame de Clignancourt. It might therefore be better to return to the previous hyphenation, although in some cases the parish website doesn't use the hyphens in question. (@Necrothesp: If you are interested by the move.) Paris91 (talk) 19:44, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

• Support. Personally I'd always go with the hyphens, both because they seem more commonly used and for consistency purposes since all these names are seen with hyphens even if they aren't always. French is never consistent about hyphenating names like these, but that doesn't mean we can't be. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:43, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.