Liturgical designation and "cleanup" issues edit

Throughout this article, Sadhvi Rithambara is referred to, after the introduction, as "Rithambara."

This is completely inconsistent with Wikipedia's standards of neutrality. Mother Theresa, almost intuitively, is continuously referred to as "Mother", never simply as "Theresa".

For those committed to Wikipedia's standards of neutrality, to use any appellation other than Sadhvi Rithambara is unacceptable.

Invalid try to project her as a terrorist more than a Sadhvi edit

The current report says that she was involved in Demolition of Babri Masjid which led to death of 2000+ People. Just for letting every responsible person know, Babri Was demolished in 1991 year and the 2000+ deaths referred to the Gujrat riots which happened 9 whole years later in 2002. there's no way she can lead to 2000 deaths for what she involved in 9 years ago. The specific Muslims of Godhara were the ones responsible for these riots. They burned down a whole train and 58 Hindu Saints in it mercilessly. This striked them down as the anger of public and many innocent lost their lives.

This is the major one, the other problems are all over the article. Telling that she urged that Muslims should be killed all over the country, which is not proved anywhere and someone who says this cannot live such a popular life in front of Indian judiciary. I am a Muslim living in India saying this. Hope this will be listened. Kenddjss (talk) 16:14, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

true.. Typical left-wing editing, we should maintain neutrality, no matter what our personal views, I have added some basic summary in intro to give an overall picture of the person. --Ekabhishektalk 13:38, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deep revert? edit

What's with the citation kill? TrangaBellam (talk) 02:28, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply