Talk:Sadh Vaishnavism

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Jenks24 in topic Requested move 7 October 2023

Sādh Vaiṣṇavism is incorrect spelling in IAST edit

Regarding Sādh Vaiṣṇavism. It is wrong based on the sources quoted as well as according to Sanskrit. The meaning is sat/sad = "true/eternal" vaiṣṇavism. It is written as "sadh" in Roman only so that it does not appear as "Unhappy (sad in english) Vaiṣṇavism". But at least when we are writing in IAST (which is supposed to represent Sanskrit accurately) we cannot write it as sādh since there is no word sādh in Sanskrit. Sādhu (saint) is there but not sādh. 203.192.214.45 (talk) 04:28, 11 February 2023 (UTC) 203.192.214.45 (talk) 04:35, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have told you how you should be proceeding twice already. You need to request a pagemove, not just change every instance of the subjects name to the name you consider to be correct. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 04:56, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 7 October 2023 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure). Ultimately unopposed for several weeks now. Jenks24 (talk) 10:49, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


Sat VaishnavismSadh Vaishnavism – Original article name before uncited name change by an editor 182.65.19.196 (talk) 14:20, 5 October 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). BegbertBiggs (talk) 18:07, 7 October 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Per the article's history and some comments at the talk page, this looks like a potentially controversial matter of translation from Sansrkit. We may need an authority on that matter to chip in. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:31, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.