 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
If Esterson's criticism is inaccurate let's have some evidence.Rathfelder (talk) 13:56, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
A number of 'more critical' updates are removed. This page is nothing other than a shill — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.143.144.87 (talk) 08:41, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Rewrite needed edit
I came to the page reading about SSP Health in this weeks BMJ, trying to find out more about the company. This page however is hardly informative, seems never to have been properly written, was full of inline external links, and loads of unsourced text, added by unregistered editorsor one time registered users like Paul T Ogden. Much of it is suspicious of self promotion, reeks of advertisement (added by IP address in Wigan), though a lot has been removed. Wuerzele (talk) 17:42, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
For example the sentence: In 2002, SSP Health pioneered 'federated General Practice', which the BMA British Medical Association described as "increasingly being viewed as a vital part of the future of general practice".[1]
This statement is totally made up, construed and unsourced- the generic ref is only for the conditional clause, where SSP is of course not mentioned. In that sense it is a fraudulent submission. I have removed the clause as non pertinent, and will move the unsourced first half to the section "unsourced"- if this isnt sourced in the near future I will delete this section.--Wuerzele (talk) 18:12, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
References
- ^ Scavone, Francesca (17 June 2021). "Primary care networks (PCNs)".
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help)