Talk:SQL:2011

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Databases (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Databases, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DatabasesWikipedia:WikiProject DatabasesTemplate:WikiProject DatabasesDatabases articles

New features in SQL:2011 edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

We should add what features/improvements have been in SQL:2011. Unfortunately, SQL is not my strong point, so others will be much more qualified to add such information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.181.64.43 (talk) 21:36, 25 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. I also don't know enough to expand it so have added a stub tag 86.173.12.117 (talk) 19:36, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Oracle's Flashback query features are only a partial implementation of SQL-2011 temporal. They lack temporal constraints, for example. Compare to SQL 2016 features for reference. Ensslen (talk) 23:57, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Automatic Time Splitting edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What does Automatic Time Splitting mean on this page. There are no examples, and the only things I found in a Google search for the phrase were exact quotes of this article? TheCycoONE (talk) 19:22, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic