 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
2011 discovery edit
Why is this a "2011" discovery? The supernova is datecoded in 2010, the (12*26+20)th of the year. 64.229.103.44 (talk) 10:38, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
- I think because it was imaged on New Year's Eve, but Gray didn't notice it until Sunday. Sceptre (talk) 17:57, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
The Discovery image was taken on New Year's eve 2010, so they numbered it 2010 otherwise it would have been the first in 2011, doh! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dave7331 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
previous youngest edit
The news said that the previous youngest person to discover a supernova was her father, who became the youngest for one he discovered in 1995. 64.229.103.44 (talk) 10:41, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Position in infobox edit
Dave Lane writes: Galaxy's position: 06:06:20.8, +83°50'19" and Supernova's position: 6h06m09s.18, +83°50'28".8. So, position in article's infobox is the position of galaxy, not of SN 2010lt. Newone (talk) 03:34, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Other SN? edit
In the up-right corner of Lane's image was some thing flickering? Newone (talk) 02:15, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
