Talk:SMS Árpád/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Comments are much the same as they were for the SMS Habsburg article since it's just a copy of that article.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Copyedit done. Buggie111 asked me check this out. All is well now. NielsenGW (talk) 02:18, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Needs a full citation for #9, Halpern.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:49, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Actually you'll be OK if you list Halpern in the sources as your formatting is correct if the info is given there.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:51, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Done on both articles. Buggie111 (talk) 13:21, 30 April 2010 (UTC)