Talk:SAP Business ByDesign

Untitled

Hi, this is the second time i have written this article with different content but still it is marked for deletion. i have added all the references from where i collected the data and put into this wiki. it is not promoting the product but summarising the product from different sources. even now i have deleted some data and left only minimal data about it. could please consider it? or let me know why you feel it should be deleted??

Thanks

First you need to explain why this software is notable. Do notable companies use it, is it technically groundbreaking? At the moment, it seems to be a list of features taken from manuals or marketing literature, which may be of interest to potential purchasers but not to someone who wants to know about its importance. TrulyBlue (talk) 19:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi, i can see that this article is now not marked for speedy deletion but it says speedy declined? what does that mean? and when i do a google search why is this page not listed? are there any changes required to be done by me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shilpakaluti (talk • contribs) 15:37, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi, this software is a new product of SAP launched in 2007. it is for SME market and whole lot is spoken about it in market. even the SAP website has this product listed. this is the first SAAS product of SAP for SME. there are customers across the world for this product and it is growing. i am from SAP hence i know information about this product. i was supposed to add in more information but it was marked for deletion, hence i have added the bare minimum to explain what the product is. the competitors are Netsuite, Microsoft, Sage.. can you let me know when this article will be published? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shilpakaluti (talk • contribs) 16:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Is it true that the project is in some heavy weather? The press releases of today (like here) suggest it's more of a liability for SAP's future than an asset for the customer. This might be interesting to known.

Probably the most important thing when contributing to Wikipedia is to provide sources of good repute, that are not easily falsified, for anything that might be contested. E.g. for product specifications, an official datasheet. For new events, a news reports are OK, but the original press release is even better. In scientific topic, peer-reviewed papers rule. And so on, you get the idea. Have fun! Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 09:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Untitled (II)

I suggest talking about the UI how it's made and what type of technology is used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.131.77.168 (talk) 22:15, 20 April 2012 (UTC)