Talk:Ruth the Betrayer

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 February 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Original research? edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

An article in the New Yorker for August 29, 2011, states that this article was the result of Original Research by a group of Wikipedians at the British Library. The references given in this article do not back up the statements made in it. Can anybody find some good, reliable Sources for what is said in here? Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have given the appropriate reference to the secondary source (the TLS) and removed the "doubtful" tag. Deipnosophista (talk) 15:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic