Talk:Ruth Badger
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
"is a big fan of the beaver" (wildlife section) edit
did someone put this in as a joke? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.85.217.239 (talk) 12:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Proposed "The Big Idea" Merge edit
Please use this space to discuss mereging "The Big Idea" into this article (Ruth Badger). Dalejenkins 17:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
ARTICLE MERGED! Dalejenkins 14:44, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
The Apprentice section needs tidying up edit
Why does the "The Apprentice" section focus more on her sexuality and previous marriage than her appearance on the TV show? I do not wish to delete the well sourced material but it definitely does not belong in the section as it currently is. 82.46.178.237 04:42, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
The Big Idea edit
Is this not a page about Ruth Badger? Is there any way that the section about the Big Idea can be separated and returned to an original page? I understand that the subject is not best pleased at being associated with the Sky One programme! Can't think why?!
WikiProject class rating edit
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 04:06, 28 August 2007 (UTC)