Talk:Ruricius Pompeianus
Latest comment: 11 years ago by 96.231.17.131 in topic Should we consider Gibbon a reliable source?
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Should we consider Gibbon a reliable source? edit
While a monumental secondary source, which has inspired research since, Gibbon's work is rather out-of-date and some of his sources are know known to be bogus. 96.231.17.131 (talk) 18:54, 13 September 2012 (UTC)