Talk:Rudi Gernreich

Gernreich's gay identity

@Trenchcoatstate:, you've twice removed the fact that Gernreich is gay and Jewish from the lede, stating in your comments that "sexual orientation and religion don't belong in the first sentence."

• First, this is your opinion, there is no style convention or guideline covering your belief.
• Second, his sexual identity was an essential and notable part of who he was throughout his life. His sexual orientation was a strong influence on his fashion designs, his attitude towards women in general, affected his social life, and impacted how he chose to conduct his business, "as Gernreich believed public acknowledgment of his homosexuality would negatively affect his fashion business," which is supported by a citation.
• Third, although his religious identity is less essential to his career and life, it's notable for the fact that he came from a prosperous Jewish family before they left Europe. It was the reason they fled Europe as refugees and came to Los Angeles, where his career was established. He would not have come to the United States if his family was not Jewish. Furthermore, his experience as a member of an oppressed Jewish minority certainly influenced his life as a homosexual when it too was an oppressed minority.
• Fourth, the fact that he is gay and Jewish is commonly noted in many articles about him and is relevant given his life history.

If you have any other valid reason for removing these facts from the lede, please note them here and we can discuss it. Otherwise I will revert your change in a few days. — btphelps ^{(talk to me) (what I've done)} 17:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Btphelps:. Of the article's approx. 3600 words, approx. 253 of them are about Gernreich's judaism and homosexuality. So, about 14% of the article. I can understand why it would make sense to include, in the first sentence, the impacts he had on fashion, because that's what almost the entirety of the article is about. But his identity having an influence on the course of his own life doesn't mean it is comparable to an influence on his overall notability.

And even if it were, no article I've seen reduces identity to an adjective. Even for individuals whose sexuality are of tantamount importance to their fame, the article doesn't lead off with it as a descriptor. Ellen DeGeneres, whose homosexuality has defined the majority of her career, is not introduced as "Ellen Lee DeGeneres is a gay American comedian." Laverne Cox, one of the most famous transgendered people in the world, is not introduced as "Laverne Cox is a transgender American actress." Granted, as with other important details, these identities are explained later in the introduction. But can you tell me why, despite the issue not being mentioned in the wikipedia style manual, the examples I gave don't seem to be acceptable additions? Trenchcoatstate (talk) 04:53, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Ok, that seems reasonable then. — btphelps ^{(talk to me) (what I've done)} 21:19, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rudi Gernreich. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091024092027/http://citypaper.net/articles/091301/cov.fall.rudi.shtml to http://citypaper.net/articles/091301/cov.fall.rudi.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:50, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rudi Gernreich. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151006123709/http://craftcouncil.org/event/total-look-creative-collaboration-between-rudi-gernreich-peggy-moffitt-and-william-claxton to http://craftcouncil.org/event/total-look-creative-collaboration-between-rudi-gernreich-peggy-moffitt-and-william-claxton
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151007070255/http://citybeat.com/cincinnati/article-32230-rudi_gernreich%E2%80%99s_%E2%80%98total_look%E2%80%99_shows_the_fashion_avant_garde.html to http://citybeat.com/cincinnati/article-32230-rudi_gernreich%E2%80%99s_%E2%80%98total_look%E2%80%99_shows_the_fashion_avant_garde.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:16, 13 January 2018 (UTC)