Talk:Royal succession bills and acts
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Qexigator in topic Title does not reflect global perspective
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Good start to the article edit
This is a good start to the article. I have done some work to clean this up to bring it in line with the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. In particular,
- coloured text is not used in Wikipedia because it causes problems for visually impaired readers -- Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Text_formatting#Color;
- repeated links and links to ordinary English words are to be avoided -- see WP:REPEATLINK;
- links should be made to substantive articles instead of to disambiguation pages -- see WP:LINK;
- deadlinks should generally be avoided;
- the Wikipedia style of capitalisation of section headings should be followed -- see WP:HEAD; and
- boldfacing should only be used in circumstances outlined in WP:BOLDFACE.
Ground Zero | t 22:25, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Title does not reflect global perspective edit
This article should be titled something like "British Royal Succession Bills and Acts" or "Royal Succession Bills and Acts of the United Kingdom". It's not even about the Commonwealth realms, let alone the world's other monarchies. --69.158.92.137 (talk) 08:22, 27 May 2014 (UTC)