I'm not convinced these edits [1] are suitable. Ignoring the fact that they were added, removed and re-added by two WP:ORGNAME users, I believe this falls under the category of WP:NOTNEWS. --Drm310 (talk) 15:59, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
It appears that RACQ staffers have been editing the page (removing local information) in the belief that Wiki is an authorised company page. [(4,858 bytes) (-1,213) . . (remove unauthorised information from company page as authorised communications staff member)] [04:40, 9 July 2015 RACQ Official (talk | contribs) . . (4,761 bytes) (-8) . . (undo | thank)] I am not sure that they are unbiased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evmuseum (talk • contribs)
- And the edits claiming to be from an "authorised communications staff member" of RACQ and a "RACQ Official" account were reverted with notice to the former (the latter was blocked from editing) that RACQ doesn't own this page. If the information is removed, it will not be for that reason (though its long-term relevance to an encyclopaedic article on RACQ is questionable, as mentioned in the section above, so it could be removed for that reason). General Ization Talk 23:41, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Reply