Talk:Royal Australian Army Medical Corps
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Royal Australian Army Medical Corps article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Fair use rationale for Image:Raamc.jpg edit
Image:Raamc.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Updated image description. RP Bravo 21:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Categorisation query edit
This article has been inappropriately added (to my mind) to a number of "individual" award categories, like Category:Australian recipients of the Military Cross. For some reason I can see those cats at the bottom of the article page, otherwise I would have removed them. Anyone? Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 10:26, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- Well spotted. It seemed to have something to do with the post-nom templates being used for a few individuals listed in the article. I've tweaked them now and I think this worked. I'm no expert on these templates though so I may have botched it too, not sure. Happy for others to further adjust if needed. Anotherclown (talk) 21:21, 17 January 2015 (UTC)