Talk:Round house (Thames and Severn Canal)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Kavyansh.Singh in topic Did you know nomination

Title edit

@Rodw: the disambiguator "Inglesham" doesn't seem appropriate here since it isn't in Inglesham but merely near it. It is in the parish of Lechlade so Round House, Lechlade might be better (since there is another on in the Cotswold district). Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Almost all sources describe it as "at Inglesham" as it is associated with Inglesham locks on the Thames and Severn Canal.— Rod talk 18:10, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
OK, I see that from Google, maybe just leave as is. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:04, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Why just this one? edit

Of the five roundhouses on the T&S, all but Coates are Grade II listed. There's nothing that is claimed in the article that makes this one more notable than the others, and nothing that doesn't apply to those other three (and, except the listed status, the one at Coates). I don't see why we're giving weight to one of the five and not the rest, and so this article should either be about all the roundhouses (i.e. Roundhouse (Thames and Severn Canal) or similar) or Thames and Severn Canal#Structures should be expanded. Thoughts? MIDI (talk) 19:42, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

A week has passed on this – I'll be drafting up a rewrite with the above in mind. MIDI (talk) 09:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:54, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
Coates round house

5x expanded by MIDI (talk). Self-nominated at 00:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC).Reply

  •   Checked with DYK check and Earwig's Copyvio Detector and everything looks good. Hook is from an offline book but MIDI was kind enough to provide a substantial quote from the source and it all seems imminently plausible. Love the hook, substantial article that covers the topic well. Gamaliel (talk) 00:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Thanks @Gamaliel:. Offering up this alt to remove the passive voice in the original and provide a bit more brevity:
  • ALT1: ... that after viewing the Coates round house (pictured), the prospective occupant's fiancée refused to marry him unless the canal company made the property more habitable?
MIDI (talk) 09:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
  •   Agree, this is a better hook, recommend promoting with ALT1. Gamaliel (talk) 03:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Promoting ALT1 to Prep 1, unfortunately, without the image. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:54, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply