Talk:Rosh Pina (Washington, D.C.)

2013

The sources regarding the halahik controversies were valid, on point, and cited. There was no reason to remove them. They help paint a more well rounded picture of the topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.49.89.95 (talk) 04:57, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

The links were blog posts, which are not considered reliable sources on Wikipedia. Also, adding the same text on multiple Wikipedia pages is considered spamming and is a good way to get oneself blocked. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 05:07, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Article name

The article about the town is entitled Rosh Pinna, although the official English name is "Rosh Pina" and all the official and semi-official references on the web show the latter as well. That is probably just a Wikipedia quirk, because the Rosh Pina minyan got the one-"n" name for itself. The minyan article should become "Rosh Pina (minyan)", and the town-related article should become "Rosh Pina" , period. Everything else is hilarious. Arminden (talk) 12:24, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Arminden, also using data from Arminden (talk) 12:24, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Izaakb

• @Arminden: you're absolutely right Israel at Sixty: An Oral History of a Nation Reborn Deborah Hart Strober, ‎Gerald S. Strober · 2008 p26 "So ten came from Germany and ten came from Vienna, and in January 1939, we came directly to Rosh Pina [located in the Galilee, founded by immigrants from Europe, and taken under Baron Edmond de Rothschild's protection]." WP:MOVED. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:31, 25 March 2023 (UTC)