Talk:Rosewood (disambiguation)

Return this page to the article on the wood

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Leave page Rosewood as the timber Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:50, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
It seems to me that there are not enough other "rosewood" articles to make this a disambiguation page. Also, there are about 10 screens worth of "what links here" links left over from when this page referred to the wood. (None of the other rosewood articles listed have more than one screen's worth of links to them). I request a return of the article now housed at Rosewood (timber) back to this page, with appropriate redirections at the top of the article. J Lorraine 10:13, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. Ewlyahoocom 06:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

Move Rosewood (disambiguation) back to Rosewood, over redirect to Rosewood (timber). Incoming links to Rosewood should be disambiguated. --Una Smith (talk) 18:10, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

• Oppose for now. Is there some evidence that the timber is not the primary topic? A quick scan of what links here didn't reveal any links that were not meant for the timber. older ≠ wiser 20:45, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose. It's clear that the wood is the primary topic. Deor (talk) 21:28, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• Oppose. The wood is the primary topic. Station1 (talk) 04:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.