Talk:Rosenbrock function
Latest comment: 9 years ago by A Thousand Doors in topic General form
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The external link "Minimization of Rosenbrock's function using the BFGS, DFP, and Steepest Descent Algorithms 2D plot" is broken. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.137.2.148 (talk) 23:09, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
work on a higher resolution image... edit
Not perfect, i.e. the axes are missing... --RokerHRO (talk) 14:13, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
General form edit
I've seen the Rosenbrock function be written in the form . Would it perhaps be better to introduce it in this more general form in this article, then say that usually a = 1 and b = 100? Thanks, A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 07:35, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- No thoughts? Very well, I'll just be bold and make the change. A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 02:27, 25 May 2014 (UTC)