Talk:Rosemarie Nitribitt

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

not acceptable as source edit

An user operating from a small ip rangeblock tries to drop a not acceptable source in the bibliography section. Here is an edit like this. I tried to revert this edits, but the user always insert the book again. It's not reliable, because it's an self-published book. Am I right doing the reverts? I think so. And I will revert the edits again. Any opinion?--Offenbacherjung (talk) 05:47, 16 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rosemarie Nitribitt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply