Talk:Rosaryhill School

Copyright issue review

Some material was added in 2007, leading to the possibility that there was a reverse copyvio. However, using Wayback, the material added was in the external article in 2006, so clearly a case of copying from another source. (This doesn't eliminate the possibility that the same author write both, but even if that is the case, the external article was available first, so proper permission must be filed if it is the same author.

I removed the material.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 15:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

A mess of promotional and copyright issues, with rafts of non-notables

The article will need a major housecleaning--appears to have been taken over by a few zealous accounts, adding layers of promotional content, with some copyvio for good measure. 2601:188:0:ABE6:2CE7:9FE7:32F1:AC2A (talk) 03:34, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

I've removed a lot of the promotional content and non-notable mentions. There are still scores of bold-face listings, and a lot of copy editing remains. For the moment I'm tapped out. 2601:188:0:ABE6:2CE7:9FE7:32F1:AC2A (talk) 02:13, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Rosaryhill Secondary School

In 2017 the former secondary section assumed its separate registration with its own IMC it may be a better arrangement to move the couple of paragraphs relevant to the secondary school to a separate article. 203.145.94.50 (talk) 10:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)